An Era Drawn to
a Close
National Post, January 2003
Toronto's Holy Trinity of cartooning bids farewell to its memorable lunches
They came, they saw, they griped. And after 11 years and more than 400 vitriol-laced
lunches, Toronto's Holy Trinity of cartooning -- Seth, Chester Brown and Joe
Matt -- is calling it quits.
Matt, the creator of Peepshow, the autobiographical comic, is pulling up stakes
and returning to his native U.S. to follow love and new opportunities. And
with his departure, the weekly ritual that is now as well known as the artists
themselves will end.
Shortly after Matt, 39, moved to the Toronto area in 1991, he insinuated himself
into the dyad that is Seth and Brown. Seth, 40, is the creator of Palookaville
and has done work for The New Times, The Wall Street Journal and The New Yorker.
Chester, 42, is the man behind Yummy Fur and Louis Riel.
Their lunches, usually at Sushi on Bloor, became a forum where they could
commiserate and kvetch about the state of their industry. It became renowned
among the alt-comic literati, mainly because they often depicted themselves
and their lunches in the pages of their comics. For example, in an early issue
of Peepshow, Chester and Seth are portrayed as ruthlessly browbeating Joe
because he can't remember who was U.S president during the Civil War -- much
less who won.
Another memorable get-together had Seth listing the reasons Matt didn't have
a girlfriend -- his addiction to pornography and the fact that he occasionally
pees in a jar to avoid using the shared bathroom in the rooming house where
he lives. When Matt insists that any offending smells are kept at bay by a
screw-on cap, Seth replies, "Good. That'll come in handy when you eventually
start s--- -ing in it. Better yet, maybe you should just start wearing adult
diapers. That way you'd never have to leave your room."
It's this level of repartee that has earned the cartoonists a reputation that
is part Algonquin Round Table, part Three Stooges.
"It's definitely a love-hate relationship," says Matt. "It's
like a Marx Brothers movie where Seth is Groucho, Chet is Harpo, the silent
one, and I'm Chico. You know, because he's the one that's always driving Harpo
crazy."
This is borne out during a recent chinwag. As they settle into their window
seat, Seth finishes recounting a favourite Stooges short (complete with Curly
impersonation) before starting a monologue that darts from early '80s punk
rock references to forgotten Canadian cartoonists to the melancholy inherent
in superhero comics of the '60s. Joe, meanwhile, struggles to keep pace, and
Chester occasionally lets loose with a whinnying laugh.
Inevitably, the conversation turns to Matt's 24-year-old girlfriend, with
whom he'll live in New York.
"She's great," says Matt. "She's good people."
"Yep. It's a shame she has to grow up," snaps Seth.
Then, after some references to Matt's slow creative pace, the conversation
turns to overrated cartoonists and the trio's perverse fondness for the Naked
Gun films.
One can assess how deep their feelings for one another are from Seth's words
at a recent going-away party: "I have never met an individual as irrational
and irritating as Joe Matt," he said. "I have spent endless hours
discussing the various merits of puppet styles in View-Master reel, over the
proper height and width of a Peanuts book or the correct volume of a urine
jar."
So why linger in such a dysfunctional relationship?
"Sometimes I'd get so sick of seeing them I'd try to skip weeks, but
they would always come right into my house, right to my bedroom door,"
Matt explains.
There's no doubt they'll miss him. In his farewell address, Seth offered up
this assessment of Matt: "He added a complexity to our little group.
He was like a grain of sand in an oyster -- an irritant that stimulates the
creation of a pearl."
From left, cartoonists Chester Brown, Seth and Joe Matt make a toast to the
future at their weekly lunch on Bloor Street, a ritual often depicted in the
pages of their comics, such as Matt's Peepshow. With Matt returning to the
U.S., the threesome's famous gatherings are no more.
Copyright 2006 Brad Mackay
Hey
Kids! No Comics!
How the comic book almost disappeared
CBC Arts Online, February 2005
Uncle Scrooge. Little
Lulu. Mighty Mouse. Captain Marvel. For years characters like these ruled
corner store comic racks across North America, earning a loyal fan base and
selling hundreds of thousands of copies each month. As any comic connoisseur
will tell you, these titles stood out thanks to charming art and clever writing
that addressed both the joys and fears of childhood.
Take Little Lulu for example: a proto-feminist in curls and a red dress. Her
misadventures throughout the 1940s, ’50s and ’60s featured kids
who were perpetually getting into trouble in an adult world, only to giddily
stumble out again. Then there was Carl Barks's beloved Uncle Scrooge, which
for 23 years weaved together colourful characters, slapstick humour and adventure
in a way the Disney Empire has rarely duplicated.
Thing is, as you’ve probably read over the past few years: comics aren't
just for kids anymore. The ongoing and well-reported shift towards a more
mature audience is the result of a veritable landslide of challenging, complex
graphic novels over the past 10 years. As clichéd as it sounds, these
really do represent an evolutionary step for the medium - there’s no
point in arguing that. But the new wave has had its costs, chief among them
being the near vacuum that’s been left in what was once a thriving market
for well-crafted kids’ comics. If you need proof, just take a stroll
through your local 7-Eleven. You'd be hard pressed to find any evidence of
kids’ comics or the iconic racks they used to call home. That’s
because the continent’s largest convenience store chain did away with
wire comic racks over the past decade, citing a lack of demand for kids’
comics. If comics of any kind are even carried you’ll have to root through
copies of People and Electronic Gaming Monthly to find them.
This might not seem like much of a loss to grown-up readers of such comics
as Chris Ware’s Jimmy Corrigan: The Smartest Kid on Earth or Chester
Brown’s Louis Riel, but it’s a matter of grave concern for those
within the industry. Michael Chabon, author of the novel The Amazing Adventures
of Kavalier and Clay, devoted his keynote address during last summer's Eisner
Awards to the matter. In an eloquent and wistful speech, the Pulitzer Prize
winning writer and occasional comic scribe took dead aim at the industry’s
dirty little secret. “Children did not abandon comics," he said
to a packed hall of comic professionals. "Comics, in their drive to attain
respect and artistic accomplishment, abandoned children. The adult reader
of comic books has always been the Holy Grail, the promised land, the imagined
lover who will greet us, at the end of the journey, with open arms, with acceptance,
with approval. … Comics have always been an arriviste art form. And
all upstarts are to some degree ashamed of their beginnings. But frankly,
I don’t think that’s what’s going on in comics anymore.
I think we have simply lost the habit of telling stories to children. And
how sad is that?”
In addition to being sad, it’s also posing a serious threat to the future
of the industry. What comic companies are worried about is this: typically,
children who devour lots of comics tend to grow up to become happy, comic-buying
adults. As the quantity and quality of kids’ comics drops so does the
number of children reading them, which eventually will cut off the supply
of adult readers who are willing to spend $40 on a hardcover comic. The free-falling
circulation and readership numbers experienced by the North American industry
over the past 15 or so years is evidence of the theory in action. There have
been many attempts to remedy this, and all but a few have proved embarrassing.
To the comic world’s credit, there have been earnest attempts to recreate
the Golden Age of Kids’ Stuff, including Measles, Scatterbrain, Yeah!
and Little Lit. But despite such A-list talent as Los Bros. Hernandez, Charles
Burns, Art Spiegelman and Ottawa’s Dave Cooper, they fell flat. In 2002
they even resorted to giving comic books away through an industry/retailer
initiative called Free Comic Book Day. The annual event has participating
publishers donate comics to be given away gratis at comic shops across North
America. The scheme managed to grab some headlines, but failed to grab that
many readers. The whole affair seems like an expensive exercise in desperation.
So aside from single-handedly eliminating video games, extreme sports and
other modern distractions, what’s a cartoonist to do?
Well, if you’re Jay Stephens, you trade in your alt-comic credentials
and start drawing kids’ comics. Stephens, who lives in Guelph, Ont.,
made a name for himself in the early ’90s with SIN Comics– a decidely
adult comic that masqueraded as a kids’ comic. (Imagine cartoony black
and white characters drinking, fighting and swearing.) Then in 1996 he adapted
some of his characters to appear in the U.S. kids’ magazine Nickelodeon,
and found near-instant success. He has gone on to draw a popular strip for
Canada’s Chickadee and create an animated cartoon on NBC called Tutenstein
based on one of his early characters. Like fellow cartoonists Joe Matt, Chester
Brown and Seth, Stephens grew up reading comics such as Little Lulu, Casper,
Archie, Mighty Mouse and of course superhero comics. Yet he’s also a
parent of a 61⁄2- and 41⁄2-year-old, which makes the current dearth
in new kids’ fare a bit more personal. “There are kids reading
comics, they’re just reading less and less of them - and I’m not
sure they ever will again,” he said. “It’s a product of
our time. There's a generational impetus on making mature work and we’ve
gone and cut off new readers. It’s like the whole ‘comics aren't
just for kids anymore’ mantra turned into a self-fulfilling prophecy."
To Stephens, the recent failed attempts at nouveau kiddie comics missed the
mark for a very specific reason. "A lot of these guys - whose work I
love by the way - are permanent adolescents. Most of them aren’t married
and hardly any of them have children. They've stayed adolescents and they're
pulling up the art form with them. They've decided that comics are for them
and them alone,” he said. “This is something that's always kind
of irked me about somebody like, say, Seth, who is a huge Peanuts fan and
Little Lulu fan, but in an intellectual way only. He embraces it as highbrow
art. We're both fans of the same material, but we have a completely different
approach. He would rather keep it just for himself. Isn’t it great because
kids can read it and it's also miraculously enjoyable for grown-ups? Isn’t
that the goal?”
Of course, it isn’t all doom and gloom according to Stephens. There
is the occasional worthwhile licensed kids’ comic, along with a flood
of Japanese manga and a reprinting of the classic Little Lulu oeuvre. But
as long as cartoonists continue to eschew the lowly kids’ stuff, the
industry will continue its freefall, which can’t be good for anyone.
As Michael Chabon says at the conclusion of his comic-manifesto: “We
have to sweep them up and carry them off on the vast flying carpets of story
and pictures on which we ourselves, in entire generations, were borne aloft,
on carpets woven by Swan and Hamilton, Kirby and Lee. They did it for us;
we have to pass it on, pay it forward. It’s our duty, it’s our
opportunity and I really do believe it will be our pleasure.”
Copyright 2006 Brad Mackay
Alternative Canadian
Walk of Fame Inductee: Iron Man
CBC Arts Online, May 2005
Reason for Induction: For being the first made-in-Canada
superhero.
Citation: By the 1940s the comic book was in the midst of
its Golden Age. Prompted by the success of Superman in the June 1938 debut
of Action Comics, a parade of costumed heroes soon followed, including the
Batman, introduced in May 1939, and Captain Marvel, who pulled on his woollens
in February 1940. But as popular as these new superheroes proved to be across
North America, Canada didn't have a comic industry to call its own until the
March 1941 debut of Better Comics.
As comic books go, Better doesn’t look like it could stand up to the
likes of Batman or Wonder Woman. The cover of issue No. 2, for example, features
simple black and white art and promised a sober — and very Canadian
— mix of “FUN — EXCITEMENT — ADVENTURE — FACTS.”
(You can almost imagine a middle-aged editor throwing that last one in to
lower the expectations of over-eager young readers.)
Notable for being created by a stable of homegrown artists/writers, Better
Comics also holds the distinction of introducing the first Canadian-made superhero,
an undersea-dwelling hero named Iron Man. Not to be confused with the better-known
(and quite frankly, more successful) Marvel Comics superhero of the 1960s,
our Iron Man lived in an underwater bubble city in the South Seas and appeared
to actually be made out of iron (which raises all sorts of transportation
and rust issues that we won’t explore here).
Created by Vernon Miller, a Vancouver native and former Disney animator, Iron
Man was portrayed as the only survivor of a civilization that was destroyed
in an earthquake. When he wasn't brooding in his submerged palace, the fearless
(and ferrous) hero answered pleas from his young pals Jean and Ted to battle
surface-world bad guys, which included such Golden Age standbys as pirates
and Nazis.
Though he called the South Seas home, Iron Man's origins were distinctly Canadian:
Better Comics owed its complete existence to an obscure cross-border trade
law. Introduced in the winter of 1940, the War Exchange Conservation Act was
designed to preserve the value of the Canadian dollar by restricting the importation
of non-essential goods from the United States. All U.S. periodicals —
including popular comic book titles like Action and Detective Comics —
fell under the new legislation.
Within months several upstart Canadian companies lined up to take advantage
of the lucrative vacuum in the comic market. Vancouver-based Maple Leaf Publishing
put out Better Comics No. 1 around the same time as Robin Hood and Company
No. 1 (by Toronto’s Anglo-American Publications), but Better was the
first out of the gate with original characters. Over the duration of the Second
World War, four Canadian companies published dozens of titles in a genre that
became known as the “Canadian Whites” — after their primarily
black and white interiors. Despite low production values and at times crude
art, the oddball adventures of the Polka-Dot Pirate, the Penguin and Nelvana
of the Northern Lights were snapped up by Canada’s comic-addicted youngsters.
After the war the U.S. comic ban was lifted and the Canadian Whites eventually
faded into obscurity. Better Comics would publish some 60 issues and feature
such bizarre, forgotten heroes as Bill Speed, Stuffy Bugs and Senorita Marquita
before ending its run in March 1946.
Of course, in the decades to follow Canada would make a more lasting impression
on the four-colour world of comics with the likes of Captain Canuck, Quebec’s
heroine Fleur de Lys and the proudly Canadian X-Man Wolverine. But, whether
they know it or not, they all owe a small debt of gratitude to Better Comics
and Canada’s own indomitable Iron Man — and that’s a fact.
Copyright 2006 Brad Mackay

Cartoons
Go Online
The Emancipation of the Funny Pages
CBC Arts Online, March 2005
If you want to take the pulse of newspaper comic strips, look no further than
Jim Davis’s Garfield, a strip that nicely sums up both what’s
right and wrong with the medium. Despite being about 20 years past its prime,
the lasagna-obsessed, Monday-phobic feline remains immensely popular, boasting
a readership of about 275 million worldwide. In 2004, it was picked up by
an additional 50 newspapers, bumping its total syndication to some 2,620 newspapers
and placing it in a tie with Charles Schulz’s masterful Peanuts for
the most syndicated strip of all time.
While there’s no arguing with hundreds of millions of Garfield fans,
Davis’s strip is perceived by many cartoonists as the Fat Elvis of the
funny pages. It’s a perfect example of what’s called a legacy
strip a title that continues to gobble up precious newspaper space and shuts
out fresh, young talents in the process. Davis’s bloated creation may
be read (or maybe I should say endured) by millions, but the strip remains
little more than an engine for an estimated annual $1-billion US merchandising
machine responsible for pumping out T-shirts, coffee mugs, plush toys and,
last summer, an inevitable $85-million US Hollywood movie. And as Davis has
admitted, Garfield has long been written by a committee and is drawn by a
stable of full-time artists none of which happens to be Davis himself. (Last
year, the 60-year-old confessed that he spent an average of five days a month
actually working on the content of his strip.)
It’s legacy strips like Garfield, Blondie, Hi and Lois (and even that
poor sad sack Ziggy) that drive people like Michael Jantze to distraction.
The 42-year-old Jantze grew up with Peanuts and was an early devotee of Bill
Waterson’s modern classic Calvin and Hobbes. He managed to channel these
obsessions into The Norm, a gently offbeat strip that recounted the life of
his titular hero Norm as he changed jobs, girlfriends and eventually got married.
Jantze, who lives in San Francisco, sold his strip to King Features Syndicate
(one of the industry’s big three, along with United Features and Universal
Press) in 1996 and slowly gained a loyal audience. But while his readership
was dedicated, The Norm stalled at just under 100 newspapers a far cry from
Garfield-like stardom. Nicole Jantze, Michael’s wife, business manager
and spokesperson, blames the lack of promotion and the ongoing reign of legacy
strips for the strips failure to break out.
“The basic syndicate contract pays [the cartoonist] under minimum wage,
when you look at the average number of papers most strips are in and the number
of days you're producing,” she explains. This situation is a result
of a revenue-splitting arrangement that is as old as the newspaper strip itself.
The standard 20-year syndicate contract sees all newspaper and merchandising
revenues divided 50-50 between the cartoonist and the syndicate. If a strip
grows enough to be picked up by say 500 papers, the artist’s cut can
be quite handsome. But thanks to the shrinking newspaper market, many young
cartoonists have been stymied by lower and lower distribution levels, which
translate into lower incomes across the board.
“It’s a very, very tough business and the creator has no control
over it,” Jantze explains. “This is because all the bargaining
is done between the [syndicates] salesperson and the newspaper editor. It
really is a syndicate, you can never forget that.”
When their contract came up in the fall of 2004 (Michael had negotiated a
rare eight-year deal) Nicole convinced him to turn his back on the syndicate.
The last newspaper version of The Norm ran on Sept. 12. The next day, Nicole
posted an announcement on their website: if enough fans were willing to pony
up a minimum of $25 US a year, The Norm would find new life as an online strip.
This wasn’t the first time someone had attempted to emancipate the comic
strip. Over the 109-year history of the form, a handful of strips such as
Fred Harman’s 1930s western strip Red Ryder and James Childress’s
Conchy in the 1970s have found success with self-syndication, by selling their
work directly to newspapers. But this was always seen as an alternate means
of attracting a syndicate’s attention. (Red Ryder for instance, was
eventually snapped up by the Newspaper Enterprise Association and went on
to inspire a radio show and a popular BB gun before ending its run in the
1960s.)
After extending their deadline to Dec. 31, the Jantze’s announced in
January that they had come close enough to their goal of 4,000 subscribers.
The Norm was re-launched as a members-only strip on Jan. 3. Tom Spurgeon,
a journalist and former newspaper strip writer who has tracked the Jantzes
venture on his website, says he was astonished that they were able to make
their online gambit work. “No one has lived the dream of becoming rich
at comic strips without the involvement of syndicates. It's the standard path
to becoming a star,” he says via e-mail. “But when it comes to
Jantze, I wouldn't be surprised if he's making twice as much this year on
The Norm than any year he was syndicated. What would happen if a more popular
strip were to try that?”
In many ways the migration of comic strips to the internet is a sound business
decision. Reacting to the twin pressures of rising newsprint costs and dwindling
readerships, newspaper publishers over the years have drastically reduced
the space devoted to strips. As a result, most strips today run at about half
the page size that Little Orphan Annie did 50 years ago. The diminishing importance
of comic strips, combined with a reluctance to recognize new talent, has resulted
in a whole generation of cartoonists who consider newspapers a near-relic.
Since 2000, dozens of young cartoonists have used the web as a self-syndication
scheme. While the quality and success of these vary widely, a few have managed
to rise above the fray and build a healthy audience. Some, like PvP, Penny
Arcade and Sluggy Freelance, have benefited from a young, video-game obsessed
readership that enables them to run their strips for free while garnering
income from video-game ads. (PvP also earns revenue with comic book-sized
strip collections.) Other sites, like Modern Tales and Serializer.net, offer
an assortment of alternative and independent comics with subscription rates
as low as $2.95 US a month.
Then there’s Chris Onstad’s Achewood, which has pushed the creative
possibilities of the internet to new and refreshingly profane ends. In October
2001, the 29-year-old Stanford University graduate launched the strip which
he claims documents what his wife’s stuffed animals do when the couple
isn't home. Crudely drawn yet often innovative, Achewood is billed by Onstad
as “a cartoon of modern life as lived by a retarded otter, an alcoholic
tiger, and two bears.” For the first two years the strip was strictly
a part-time venture. Buoyed by T-shirt sales and his self-published strip
collections, the San Francisco Bay Area resident quit his job in 2003 and
began chronicling the twisted adventures of his four stuffed protagonists
full-time. But unlike the Jantzes, who tried but failed to make it big in
newspapers, Onstad has little interest in setting up shop next to Beetle Bailey.
“I see the ‘Funny Pages’ as a false goal for cartoonists.
Cartoonists have to horribly emasculate themselves if they want to see newsprint,”
he says via e-mail. “Newspapers were a flawed mechanism for getting
this sort of entertainment to people anyway, but they were the only way. Not
anymore. It's easier to send the link to my strip to your friend than a cut-out
clipping.”
To him the online environment is as essential to the success of his strip
as the syndicates were for generations of cartoonists before him. “The
internet offers nothing but benefits for me. I can write whatever I want and
not have some editor gating my work. It lives or dies via word of mouth.”
So what does he think about the future of the newspaper syndicates?
“I don't really care about what happens with the syndicates. I do my
thing, we run our business, we follow our vision,” he says. “It's
all a nice ‘Fuck You’ to the guys in ties and short shirtsleeves
who hold new comics up against the gold standard of Garfield.”
Copyright 2006 Brad Mackay
Copyright 2006 Brad Mackay
Always
Cute and Often Cruel
National Post Books, May 2004
Charles Monroe Schulz was arguably the most successful artist in the history
of popular American culture. According to Forbes magazine, he earned some
US$32-million last year -- a payday that placed him runner-up only to Elvis
Presley on the publication's annual list of wealthiest dead celebrities. And
in 1999, a panel of comic critics and scholars voted Peanuts, his life's work,
the second-greatest comic strip of the 20th century. (It came a distinguished
second to George Herriman's masterpiece, Krazy Kat.)
Yet despite both critical and financial success, Schulz himself never shook
his inherently bleak view of life. Consider this ode to loneliness from a
1985 Peanuts collection: "The most terrifying loneliness is not experienced
by everyone and can be understood by only a few. I compare the panic in this
kind of loneliness to the dog we see running frantically down the road pursuing
the family car. He is not really being left behind, for the family knows it
is to return, but for that moment in his limited understanding he is being
left alone forever, and he has to run and run to survive."
The more introspective Schulz is an unknown entity to the majority of Peanuts
fans, whose impressions are coloured by the waves of T-shirts, coffee mugs,
greeting cards and souvenir ball caps that began to emerge in the 1960s. (A
1967 New York Times Magazine article about Schulz revealed that Peanuts was
already earning more than $20-million in licensing fees.)
There are now two new books that aim to resuscitate some of the original Schulz
wit and sophistication that existed long before Snoopy became an insurance
company shill.
The Complete Peanuts 1950 to 1952 is the first of an ambitious 12 1/2-year
project that will see every Peanuts strip reprinted in 25 hardcover volumes.
Published by U.S. alternative comics stalwart Fantagraphics Books and designed
by Canadian cartoonist Seth, the handsome tome includes scores of Peanuts
strips that haven't been seen by the public since they first appeared in newspapers
more than half a century ago. (Schulz was always selective about what went
into his Peanuts collections, and indeed only grudgingly gave his approval
for this project before he died in January, 2000.)
The first strip, which appeared in October, 1950, depicts the soon-to-be star
of the feature walking by some friends. As he approaches, his pal Shermy comments,
"Well! Here comes Ol' Charlie Brown! Good Ol' Charlie Brown ... Yes,
sir!" The final panel, after Charlie has passed by, ends with the rebuke
"How I hate him!"
And that bite is spread throughout the strip's first 27 months, with Everyman
Charlie suffering a host of undignified firsts; his first mud pie (courtesy
of Violet), his first trademark "Good Grief," his first baseball
game and the first time a football is yanked away from him -- though, in this
case, it's not Lucy's fault.
A glance at the index gives you an idea of what to expect. The annotations
for Charlie Brown include citations for "failure in sports or games ...",
"injuries to ..." and an "insults to ...", a listing that
is divided into "general" and "re: size and shape of head."
Much of the joy of this book is in witnessing Schulz in his embryonic period
as an artist, before he settled into a regular cast with defined personalities.
For the first 100 or so strips, there is no clear "star" among the
tight cast of Patty, Shermy, Charlie Brown and Snoopy. In fact, Charlie is
depicted as a relatively worry-free little guy. It's only as the strip progresses
that he evolves into his signature mix of bruised ego and wounded pride.
As Violet, Schroeder, Lucy and Linus are introduced in a horizon full of sandboxes
and slides, Schulz never fails to depict them as both endearingly cute and
unerringly cruel. One rarely exists without the other. In an era when the
domestic comedy of Blondie and the square-jawed justice of Dick Tracy ruled
the funny pages, this collection offers a brisk reminder the uniqueness of
Charles Schulz's arch take on the world at the time.
Of course, Schulz devotees will know that Peanuts is not the Minnesota native's
first foray into the comic pages. More than three years before Peanuts, the
artist produced L'il Folks, a weekly feature that ran in the women's section
of the St. Paul Pioneer Press. The gag-style feature, which ran from June,
1947, to January, 1950, shows a much younger Schulz in both style and content.
All 134 cartoons have been gathered for the first time in Charles M. Schulz:
Li'l Beginnings, published by the Charles M. Schulz Museum.
True devotees will get a thrill out of spotting familiar characters like a
telltale black and white pup and several Charlie Brown doppelgangers. And
even this early on, Schulz's trenchant wit is evident -- one panel has a boy
telling a fisticuffed girl "Don't hit me! Just say something sarcastic."
But the one-panel format of these strips limits their appeal by not allowing
for any narrative or character development. As well, the art here is clearly
Schulz trying to find his way, much of it bland and stiff. The poor reproductions
and shallow commentary don't help.
But in the waning weeks of L'il Folks, Schulz comes into his own, simplifying
a style that he would expand upon in Peanuts.
But Schulz's goal was always to keep the cartoon simple. "I like it,
for example, when Charlie Brown watches the first leaf of fall float down
and then walks over and just says 'Did you have a good summer?' That's the
kind of strip that gives me pleasure to do."
Copyright 2006 Brad Mackay
Copyright 2006 Brad Mackay